Legal Opinion

Mills v. Mills & Connelly

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 21, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Reversing.

Appellant, -while operating a concrete mixer as an employee of appellee, Mills & Connelly, on the 8th of November, 1923, was injured. The firm was operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and appellant had accepted the provisions of that act. The appellee, Continental Casualty Company, was the insurer of the employees of Mills & Connelly, and as such was made a party to the proceedings before the compensation board.

The hearing before the board was had on an agreed state of facts which show in substance that appellant was employed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Kentucky River Stone & Sand Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Wirth Lang Company v. MeeceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Nelson v. Kentucky River Stone & Sand Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Murphy Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Holt v. West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Bickel v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Hart & Commodari Construction Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Marshall v. Octavia J. Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API