Legal Opinion

Barth v. Florida State Contractors Service, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 22, 1974No. 74-329PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of foreclosure on a mechanic’s lien.

Appellant raises three points on appeal. First, appellant contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by denying her a jury trial on a legal counterclaim seeking damages for labor performed in an unworkmanlike manner.

However, our review of the record in the instant case convinces us that the appellant waived her right to a trial by jury. May v. Arnold Const. Co., Fla.1955, 78 So.2d 705; Hightower v. Bigoney, Fla. 1963, 156 So.2d 501.

By her second point, appellant attacks the judgment on the merits, arguing that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hightower v. BigoneySupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Shotkin v. BuchananDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. May v. Arnold Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barth v. Florida State Constructors Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Grant v. WesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Barth v. Florida State Constructors Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Barth v. Florida State Contractors Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API