Legal Opinion

Kaloustian v. Tampa Armature Works, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 2009No. 1D08-3088, 1D08-3940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, Claimant 'raises two issues. The first concerns the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC) award of costs to the Employer/Carrier (E/C) pursuant to section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes. The second concerns the JCC’s finding that Claimant’s claim for an independent medical examination (IME) was barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons explained below, we re verse as to the first issue. We affirm as to the second without further comment.

Claimant filed two petitions for benefits (PFBs), one of which requested, inter alia, an orthopedic IME. Both PFBs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muina v. CanningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gomar v. Ridenhour Concrete and SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Trent v. CHARLOTTE SANITATION AND CNADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Carrillo v. Case Engineering, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API