Legal Opinion

Walker v. GEICO General Insurance Company

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 5, 2021No. 8:20-cv-02338Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ADAM SCOTT WALKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:20-cv-2338-T-KKM-AAS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________________/ ORDER Defendant Geico moves to dismiss Plaintiff Adam Walker’s bad-faith claim (Count II). Walker never responded to Geico’s motion, and the time to do so has now passed. See Local Rule 3.01(c). Walker’s complaint alleges that Geico is responsible for paying underinsured motorist benefits for an auto accident involving Walker (Count I). Walker further alleges that Geico…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Ronald R. Romano v. American Casualty Co. Of Reading, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Mary Bottini v. GEICOCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API