Legal Opinion

Abraham Bros. v. Means

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1918No. 3 Div. 216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; W. W. Pearson, Judge. On second application for rehearing.

1Per curiam

This ease was carried to the Supreme Court on certiorari, and by that court reversed and remanded to this court for further action. We are now asked to pass upon the questions not considered in the first opinion. Abraham Bros. v. Noah Means, ante, p. 42, 75 South. 187.

[1,2] The cause was tried on two counts; count 2 claiming for a breach of warranty, and count 3 for money had and received. There was nothing to indicate that the claims as set out were for inconsistent remedies growing out of the same transaction. The complaint therefore was not subject to demurrer on that ground. Code 1907, §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abraham Bros. v. MeansAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler v. WaltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Kilborn v. HendersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Webb v. LitzAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Butler v. WaltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API