Legal Opinion
In re Water Right of Utah Const. Co.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 12, 1929No. 681PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAH, District Judge.
The Utah Construction Company, a citizen and resident of the state of Utah, originally instituted, in June, 1927, a proceeding before the commissioner of reclamation of the state of Idaho, under the provisions of section 5582 of the Compiled Statutes of Idaho, as amended by Laws 1921, c. 146, for the purpose of seeming permission to change the point of diversion and place of use of 15.3 cubic feet per second of the waters of Big Lost river. At the hearing before the commissioner, a number of water users on the river, who. were all citizens and residents of Idaho,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Upshur County v. RichSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Green River Drainage AreaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
- Minnesota v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
- State of Nebraska v. Northwestern Engineering Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
- Sabine State Bank & Trust Co. v. SchoonmakerDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1945
- Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.