State v. Livingston
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree, a felony. ORS 164.055. He argues that it was error to deny his demurrer to the indictment because the Statute of Limitations had run. We agree and reverse.1
On September 6,1980, defendant bought a guitar and amplifier from a music store for $1550. He paid with a worthless check. On February 5, 1981, he was indicted for theft in the first degree and an arrest .warrant issued that date. On December 8, 1983, defendant was extradited from Pennsylvania and returned to Oregon. On January 25, 1984, a second indictment was returned that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. MathieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BoveeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. GruhlkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. EhrleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. EhrleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. FillipponeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985