Grieser v. Division of Administration, State Department of Transportation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMES, Chief Judge.
These are appeals from orders in a condemnation action determining that a defendant whose sole interest in the condemned property is that of a vendor under a contract for deed is not entitled to recover costs and attorney’s fees from the condemning authority.
■ The courts of Florida have consistently held that a vendor’s interest in a contract for deed is a security or lienhold interest. *165Adkinson v. Nyberg, 344 So.2d 614 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Hoffman v. Semet, 316 So.2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Arko Enterprises, Inc. v. Wood, 185 So.2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). Therefore, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shavers v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Hoffman v. SemetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Arko Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Orange State Oil Company v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Adkinson v. NybergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- STATE, DOT v. Ben Hill Griffin, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Seminole County v. M.G. Investments of Orlando, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998