Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fruehan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1989No. 2347PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue of first impression in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth should be allowed to appeal the discretionary aspects of a sentence after it agreed as part of a negotiated plea agreement to stand mute with respect to the sentence to be imposed by the trial court. After careful consideration, we conclude that to allow the Commonwealth’s appeal would be to permit it to breach its plea agreement and deprive the defendant of the benefits thereof. Therefore, we disallow the Commonwealth’s appeal.

Robinson Fruehan entered a plea of guilty to attempted rape pursuant to a plea…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. HainesworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. ReichleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. JaroszSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shower, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API