Bank of St. Helens v. Mann's Exor.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Drury, Commissioner—
Affirming.
The bank of St. Helens sued 'Constance B. Mann upon a balance which it.alleged was due it upon a note for $5,800.58 executed to it by: her. In her answer, she did not deny executing it, or the correctness of the balance sued for, but averred that the whole thereof was the debt of her husband, Louis Mann, and that she was, at the time fshe executed the note, a married woman. Plaintiff by its reply admitted that, and pleaded further that the note represented in part a debt of Louis Mann, who was the owner of a farm in Jefferson county, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baskett, Nichols & Norment v. RudyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Brady v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Third Nat. Bank v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Swearingen's v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Black v. McCarley's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bedinger v. Graybill's & TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Vinaird v. Bodkin's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Dwiggins v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- People's Bank v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Simmons v. MaxeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.