Legal Opinion
We Who Care, Inc. v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 19, 1991No. Civ. 89-0172-PPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.
This case arose out of a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) brought by applicants for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (hereinafter “AFDC”) to challenge Defendant Louis Sullivan’s, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, regulations that limited to $1,500 the amount of equity that an AFDC recipient could have in an automobile and thus be eligible for AFDC benefits. Plaintiffs alleged that these regulations were arbitrary and capricious, were promulgated in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wells v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Kimball v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1993