Legal Opinion

Gillette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 1990No. 90-01429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for sale of cocaine. We vacate his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine on the authority of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in V.A.A., we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND AND THE CRIMES OCCURRED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SECTION 775.021, FLORIDA STATUTES (1988 SUPP.), IS IT IMPROPER TO CONVICT AND…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. V.A.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luizza v. YaegerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. State v. GilletteSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API