Legal Opinion

Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. Niagara Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 19, 1999No. 97-P-0825PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

This is an appeal by two insurance companies over who had the duty to defend an underlying tort action. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Hingham) filed a complaint in the Superior Court for declaratory relief seeking contribution or *501indemnity from Niagara Fire Insurance Company (Niagara) for legal defense costs incurred in the underlying action. Both parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. A judgment entered in the Superior Court ordering Niagara to pay $31,395.22, one-half of the defense costs incurred by Hingham. Both parties have appealed from this judgment. We affirm the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Terrio v. McDONOUGH HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. VAPPI & CO. INC. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n v. WynnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Aguiar v. Generali Assicurazioni InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. MacLean v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Collins v. HeasterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Espedito Realty, LLC v. National Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API