Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Poole

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1956No. 19212PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

1. The holder of a junior security deed is equitably entitled, when it is necessary for his protection, to pay the holder of a prior security deed who is proceeding to sell the pledged property under a power of sale contained in his security deed, the principal, interest and all costs due thereon, and demand a transfer thereof. In other words, the holder of a junior security deed, where the property is being sold under a power of sale contained in a senior security deed, has a right, in order to protect his interest, to redeem the property and be subrogated to all of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Durham v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Bank of Brooklet v. Motor Liens Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Tillman v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. General Refractories Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. Mount Bethel United Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Edwards-Warren Tire Co. v. CobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Bromley v. BromleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API