Legal Opinion

Land v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1926No. 24,526PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTravis, J.

Three errors are sought to be presented by the brief upon the assignment of errors: (1) That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. An attempt was made to support this alleged error by stating one abstract proposition of law, which is true, but does not point to any absence of evidence to prove every material element of the offense or any one of them; and one abstract proposition of law which is erroneous and has no bearing on the case. McCrocklin v. State (1920), 189 Ind. 254, 126 N. E. 678. (2) That the court refused to permit a witness to answer a question. The brief does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. MarschkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. McCrocklin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Dampier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humble v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Onstott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Detrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. French v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Dudley, Trustee v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API