Legal Opinion

Salt Lake Inv. Co. v. Stoutt

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1919No. 3226PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Salt Labe County, Third District; Hon. Harold M. Stephens, Judge. Action by the Salt Lake Investment Company against J. M. Stoutt. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an action to recover on a promissory note for the sum of $2,019.90. The complaint alleges the execution of the note July 1, 1911, payable to plaintiff within one year from date, with interest at 8 per cent, per annum. It purports to be given for a valuable consideration, and provides for a reasonable' attorney’s fee if suit is brought for its collection'.' The complaint also alleges that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the note'; that the same has not been paid nor any part thereof; that $300 is a reasonable attorney’s fee; and prays judgment accordingly.

The answer of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Car Co. v. Atlanta Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Waring v. GaskillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Richardson v. AshbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. McKay v. FarrUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Montague v. SteltsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. First National Bank of Salt Lake City v. HaymondUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Shields Et Ux. v. EkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. George B. Leavitt Co. v. CouturierUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Summers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API