Hettrick Mfg. Co. v. James A. Shepherd & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error (hereinafter called plaintiff) is a corporation organized under the laws of Great Britain and doing business at Glasgow, Scotland. Plaintiff in error (hereinafter called defendant) is an Ohio corporation, doing business at Toledo in that state. It is undisputed that on or about July 23, 1915, defendant’s predecessor, a manufacturer of cotton duck, to whose obligations defendant has succeeded, contracted with plaintiff, which had ,a. contract with the British government for wagon covers, for the sale and delivery to plaintiff of 83,500 yards of 38-inch…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Robinson v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Pennsylvania Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Empire Fuel Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DETROIT, T. & IR CO. v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Refiners Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Viront v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950