Legal Opinion

Sharp v. McCargar

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Defendants’ principal assignment of error is that the plaintiff having brought this action on a common count for money had and received, there is a fatal departure in that the proof discloses a written contract executory in its terms. Plaintiff in his complaint alleges:

“That on or about the 29th day of March, 1919, the defendants had and received of plaintiff the sum of $5,000, which they promised and agreed to repay to plaintiff upon demand.
“That plaintiff on or about the 21st day of February, 1921, demanded of defendants the return of said money, which they declined, refused, and neglected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levin v. StremplerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  2. Freese v. PavloskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Savage, as Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hogan v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Halvorson v. Blue Mountain Prune Growers CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wolfe v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  5. Halvorson v. Blue Mt. Prune Growers Co-Op.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API