In re McIntyre
New York Surrogate's Court
Application to require the administrator of this estate to file a further inventory. The answer of the administrator, verified by him, alleged that he had included in his inventory all the property that belonged to the estate of decedent.
1Opinion of the Court
The'Subrogate.—By the former statute authorizing the Surrogate, in casé of the neglect of the executor or administrator, to require him to appear and return an inventory, &c., there was no provision made for the-amendment of an inventory, but in Sheldon v. Bliss (8 N. Y., 31), it was held that the Surrogate might require the inventory to be amended, where the executor had made no exception of articles for the use of the widow ; and in Iieclfteld’s Law & Practice, page 216, it is stated that the power to require such amendment was not derived from the language of the statute in reference to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomson v. ThomsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1849
- Deborah Sheldon v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Goundry v. BrinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- In re the Estate of HowardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- Vogel v. ArbogastNew York Surrogate's Court · 1886