Legal Opinion
Eidelman v. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 17, 1972No. [No. 342, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We here have cross-appeals relative to the liability of guarantors of a lease for a drugstore in a shopping center. The premises were vacated after a receiver was appointed for the lessee.
Appellee and cross-appellant, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (Walker & Dunlop), acted as landlord, including the bringing of suit in this case, for Pikesville Shopping Center at 1402 Reisterstown Road, Pikesville. On December 29, 1964, a lease was made to Ideal Drugs, Inc. (Ideal). Appellants and cross-appellees, Albert Pearl-man and Nathan Eidelman, joined in the lease for the purpose of guaranteeing performance of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- McNally v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Biggs v. StuelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Oldewurtel v. WiesenfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- I. W. Berman Properties v. Porter Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- United Cable Television of Baltimore Ltd. Partnership v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Maryland State Highway Administration v. KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- First Virginia Bank v. SettlesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.