Legal Opinion

United States v. Rajaratnam

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 24, 2013No. Docket 11-4416-crPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

In this “insider information” securities fraud case, we consider two issues on appeal raised by defendant-appellant Raj Rajaratnam. The first issue is whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard J. Holwell, Judge) should have suppressed the evidence obtained by the government’s wiretap of Rajaratnam’s cell phone. Specifically, Rajaratnam argues that the District Court erred by applying the analytical framework set forth in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), to determine whether…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Steginsky v. Xcelera Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Picard v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. GuptaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Calderon v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius, Ltd. v. the TriZetto Grp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API