Potts v. Alexander
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York
Tn Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This is a motion by the complainant for leave to file his replication nunc pro tunc. The complaint was filed August 7, 1901. The answer was filed December 9, 1901, after several extensions by stipulation. On March 24, 1902, no replication having been filed, an order was entered as of course dismissing the complaint pursuant to equity rule 66. It appears by the moving papers that complainant’s counsel who prepared the bill resides at Marion, Ind. His solicitor is a resident within the jurisdiction of this court. Each seems to have relied upon the other to file the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pyle v. FerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Ortiz de Rodriguez v. VivoniDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1904
- Pyle v. FerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Ross v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.