Legal Opinion

Marble Falls Ferry Co. v. Spitler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1894No. 676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Suit was originally brought in the County Court. . The facts are given in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

This is a garnishment proceeding by Joe Spitler, the appellee, against the Marble Falls Ferry Company, a corporation doing business under the laws of this State. The original suit to which this is ancillary was by Joe Spitler against Burns & Dillon, for $330.19. The writ of garnishment was sued out by the plaintiff against the Marble Falls Ferry Company on the next day after the original suit was filed, to wit, on the 30th day of October, 1891, and was served on the same day. The answer of the company denied each question propounded by the writ, which answer was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Iglehart v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Teague, Barnett & Co. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Thomas v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Early v. Town of Redwood CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutcheson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Shropshire v. Alvarado State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Wirt Franklin Petroleum Corp. v. GruenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Neal v. KurzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Shropshire v. Alvarado State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API