Legal Opinion

Tillinghast v. United States Saving & Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1906No. Nos. 14,719—(110)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey County, Kelly, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. J

Action to recover an alleged balance of $537.89 on a judgment recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, findings of fact made, and judgment ordered for the defendant on the merits. The plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of fact, except a finding as to the insolvency of the defendant, is not here challenged. The other assignments of error relate to the alleged errors in the admission of evidence.

The facts found by the trial court were in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Leahy v. National Building & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Heinbokel v. National Savings, Loan & Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Towle v. American Bldg., Loan & Inv. Soc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1894
  5. Chapman v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brunette v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Moe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Wilson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API