Legal Opinion
Becton Dickinson & Co. v. R. P. Scherer Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1954No. 11798PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a declaratory action wherein appellant prayed that Patent No. 2322245, issued to Lockhart on June 22, 1943, and Patent No. 2380534, issued to Lockhart July 31, 1945, for hypodermic injectors called “hypospray” patents be held void for fraud and that appellant’s contracts with reference thereto be held null and void and rescinded and can-celled and that the court declare that appellant’s needleless hypodermic devices do not infringe. It also attacked the validity of both patents. The District Court found that fraud was not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Renz v. BeemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Edward Valves, Inc., and Rockwell Manufacturing Company v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Neff Instrument Corporation, a Corporation v. Cohu Electronics, Inc., and Neely EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.