Legal Opinion

Rutkowski v. Geist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 22, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated January 3, 1983, which denied their motion to amend their complaint so as to increase the ad damnum clause. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiffs’ time to serve an amended complaint containing the increased ad damnum clause is extended until 20 days after service upon them of 'a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. Defendant is granted leave to conduct a further physical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Maddox v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Vincent Esposito v. Time Motor Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Colon v. FongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fulciniti v. European American BankNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Poitevien v. MontefuscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API