Legal Opinion

Toman v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 4, 1983No. Nos. 82-1452, 82-1517 and 82-1518PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Underwriter’s Laboratories Inc. (UL) took separate appeals from separate judgments 1 dismissing Counts I and III of UL’s separate third-party complaints against Morris Struhl, Inc. (Struhl) and Superior Electric Products, Inc. (Superior). This court consolidated the appeals.

The complaint in this diversity case was brought on behalf of Marina Toman for burns she received when her bedding and nightclothes, allegedly ignited by a Chic *621hairdryer, flamed. The Chic hairdryer was manufactured by Superior and distributed by Struhl. The complaint alleges that UL was negligent in testing and approving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Stewart v. Roy Bros. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Shea v. BAY STATE GAS CO. CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Garbincius v. Boston Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LevasseurDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  2. Latino Political Action Committee, Inc. v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
  3. Morgan v. Financial Planning Advisors, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API