Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1929No. 12717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for robbery; punishment, twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

We find no statement of facts in the record. Appellant complains of the refusal of the court to order the names of all jurors for the week to be put in a box and be drawn therefrom as was required under Art. 5158j^-f, R. S. Í920. Said article was not brought forward in the Revised Statutes of 1925, but the substance of same is brought forward and the cases of Bell v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep. 342, and Huffhines v. State, 251 S. W. Rep. 229, — decided with reference to said statute, — are in point so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Huffhines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Hoebrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Hoebrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API