Legal Opinion
D.T.N. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 31, 2002No. 2D00-4252PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that “[a] pretrial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.”)
ALTENBE RND, NORTHCUTT, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pendarvis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dessin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004