Legal Opinion

D.T.N. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 2002No. 2D00-4252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that “[a] pretrial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.”)

ALTENBE RND, NORTHCUTT, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pendarvis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dessin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004