Legal Opinion

Tate v. Barcroft

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1822PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Howard county.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Girk, C. J.

This was an action of covenant brought by Tate, the appellant, against Barcroft. The declaration states, that on the-- day of-«, &c., the said Elias made his covenant, (without saying to whom he made it,) and that he thereby covenanted, (without saying with whom,) that he would become responsible, (without saying to whom,) for the one-half of a certain note for $408, given by Tate, and one Turby, to W. V. Rector &. Co.j and also, that he, Barcroft, would forever free the said Tate from any costs that might accrue on said note. The breach is, that Barcroft did not become responsible and free…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cockrill v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API