Legal Opinion

Godchaux v. Stille

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 1928No. 29237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a suit to compel the defendant to accept a check for $20, the agreed consideration for a 6 .months’ extension of the time fixed in a mineral, oil, and gas lease for the beginning of drilling operations on 40 acres of land which is described in the contract. The term of the lease was one year, and the consideration therefor was i$40, payable semiannually. The lease contains the following provision:

“Said lessee shall have the exclusive right to make as many attempts, as lessee shall desire, to find oil or gas in paying quantities on or in said premises. Lessee may begin operations in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wagner v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Spearing v. Whitney-Central Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Lea v. OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. Wilkins v. GanttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. Wunderlich v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Templet v. BabbittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Accardo v. DimiceliLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Le Rosen v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  4. Le Rosen v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Lewis v. CochraneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API