Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Everett v. Morgan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1925No. 18684. Department TwoPublished

1DissentParker, J.

(dissenting)—-I am not at all satisfied with the disposition by the Department decision upon the question of the right of the city to foreclose being barred by § 162, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. § 8167], which reads:

“Actions to set aside or cancel the deed of any county treasurer issued after and upon the sale of lands for general, state, county or municipal taxes, or for tile recovery of lands sold for delinquent taxes, must be brought within three years from and after the date of the issuance of such treasurer’s deed: Provided, that this section shall not apply to actions not otherwise barred…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Maryland Realty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Baylis v. KerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Lara v. SandellWashington Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API