Legal Opinion

Barry Dean Rogers, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Luther James Rogers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1968No. 11699PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

In a peculiar and not entirely undisputed fact situation involving Appellant Rogers’ claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the district judge entered summary judgment for the Government. We think that further development of the facts and surrounding circumstances would assist in making correct determinations of difficult questions of law, and we reverse and remand for trial. See 3 Barron & Holtzoff § 1234 (1958).

While awaiting trial on a charge of interstate transportation of a stolen automobile, the 17-year-old plaintiff, Rogers (probationer), was confined in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Arnold Panella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Jones v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Thigpen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API