Commonwealth v. Castro
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
¶ 1 Appellant brings this direct appeal from the judgment of sentence entered upon revocation of probation. He claims that principles of collateral estoppel bar the court’s revocation order. We disagree and so affirm.
¶2 On August 20, 2001, appellant entered an open guilty plea to charges of aggravated assault and possessing an instrument of crime (PIC). The trial court imposed an aggregate sentence of seven to fifteen months in prison followed by three years probation. Appellant was granted immediate parole to house arrest and did not file a direct appeal.
¶ 3 On November 7, 2001, while…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HolderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RoysterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Simmons, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Commonwealth v. A.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. A.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Com. v. Beattie, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.