Bulanek v. WesTTex 66 Pipeline Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Zwahr, 88 S.W.3d 623, 630-31 (Tex.2002), we reversed a condemnation award, holding that the testimony of the landowners’ expert, Brad Kangieser, was irrelevant and inadmissible because he “relied on [the] condemnation in establishing a separate economic unit and in assigning a value to that unit,” and “failed to apply the before-and-after valuation method, which would have required him to evaluate the [easement] as a proportionate part of the entire [tract].” Following Zwahr, the court of appeals reversed the condemnation award in this case, which was partly based on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Kerr-McGee Corp. v. HeltonTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Westtex 66 Pipeline Co. v. Bulanek, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- Joshua M. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. Jasdeep Singh Chana, Manjit Singh Chana and Amar Pal Singh ChanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.