Legal Opinion

Bulanek v. WesTTex 66 Pipeline Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2006No. 04-0011PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Zwahr, 88 S.W.3d 623, 630-31 (Tex.2002), we reversed a condemnation award, holding that the testimony of the landowners’ expert, Brad Kangieser, was irrelevant and inadmissible because he “relied on [the] condemnation in establishing a separate economic unit and in assigning a value to that unit,” and “failed to apply the before-and-after valuation method, which would have required him to evaluate the [easement] as a proportionate part of the entire [tract].” Following Zwahr, the court of appeals reversed the condemnation award in this case, which was partly based on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exxon Pipeline Co. v. ZwahrTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kerr-McGee Corp. v. HeltonTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Westtex 66 Pipeline Co. v. Bulanek, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  2. Joshua M. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. Jasdeep Singh Chana, Manjit Singh Chana and Amar Pal Singh ChanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  5. Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API