Legal Opinion

Mungo v. Shedd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1966No. 18454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

The parties agree that the following question fairly presents the controlling issue on this appeal:

“Where a school district lies in part in Richland County and in part in Lexington County and, by virtue of special constiutional amendments any school district in Richland County is permitted to incur bonded indebtedness up to an amount not in excess of 15% of the assessed value of all taxable property therein and any school district in Lexington County is permitted to incur bonded indebtedness to an amount not exceeding 20% of the assessed value of all taxable property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. FarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Tindall v. BYARSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Holland v. KilgoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API