Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clay v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 12, 1828Published

Debt. Appeal from the Franklin Circuit; IIekry Davidge, Judge. Consideration. Assignor and Assignee. Diligence by suit. Compromise. Mistakes. Judges not concw;ing. Frac-» tice in this Court

1Concurrence

Judge Owsley

delivered his own opinion.

I concur in reversing the judgment which was rendered by the circuit court in this case. But as the opinion just delivered has not, in *657every point, my assent, and as the cause must go back to the circuit court for further proceedings, it is due to the case that I should give my views on the points of difference. This I shall proceed to do.

Question, on ?vh,ich *jle agree! lS* ^icfonce?3 motionTfor instiuctions as in case thaTaffirma-' tive pleas are not main-taine“"

The action was brought by Clay, the appellant, against the appellees, on a note for $2,240,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson's executors v. DeasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814
  2. Smallwood v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
  3. Spratt v. M'KinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
  4. Brinker v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API