Legal Opinion
Gorman v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 1985No. 2147; 2148PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
These cases involve two former members of the Waterbury police department whose widows are claiming benefits under General Statutes § 7-433C.1 The *227workers’ compensation commissioner dismissed both claims and the compensation review division affirmed the commissioner’s decisions. The plaintiffs appealed.2 We find no error.
*228I
The facts as revealed by the administrative record in Appeal No. 2148 are as follows: John Meaney was a regular, uniformed police officer for the city of Waterbury. He had successfully passed a pre-employment physical examination which did not reveal any evidence of heart…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Howell v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Shelby Mutual Insurance v. GhelfaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Grover v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Staurovsky v. Milford Police Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Bergin v. Department of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Montgomery County v. PirroneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Leppert v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Staurovsky v. Milford Police Dept.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016