Home Insurance Co. v. Gillum

OPINION

UTTER, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case wherein appellee recovered total and permanent disability benefits from appellant. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Appellant primarily challenges the trial court’s rulings, which excluded certain evidence and which denied certain special issues and instructions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellee was working for his employer, Berry Contracting, on August 6, 1981, when he sustained an injury to his lower back. On August 10, 1981, the following Monday after the…