Legal Opinion

Perry v. Barnard

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 12, 1990No. EV 88-24-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, District Judge. MEMORANDUM ENTRY ON THE FOLLOWING:

THE DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S “PETITION TO SETTLE BY STIPULATION,” “PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SPEEDY HEARING AND TO ADVANCE THE CALENDAR,” “PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND/OR PETITION FOR REHEARING” FILED DECEMBER 22, 1988, PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND/OR PETITION FOR REHEARING” FILED APRIL 27, 1989, AND THE STATE DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1982);

THE GRANTING OF “PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND BY SUBSTITUTION PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF PURSUANT TO ORDER OF MAY 11, 1989,”…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lloyd G. Perry v. Anonymous Physican 1, Alias Medical Group 1, Inc., Anonymous Physican 2Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Diaz v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
  3. In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  4. THOMPSON v. MAJCHROWICZDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API