Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borga v. Hendrickson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 11, 1949No. 16,180Published

1DissentJustice Holland

Firm in the belief that the rule followed in the majority. opinion does not apply to the will here involved, I dissent.

It is most likely, and dangerously so, that the effect of the ruling as announced in the opinion would take too many of the decisions made by executors out of the control of the probate court. In all the cases cited in the majority opinion, in support of the ruling, the will involved gave the executor undeniable and complete discretion as I will later demonstrate.

Before us is paragraph 21 of Hirshorn’s will in the following words:

“21. As to my one-half interest in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Debancourt's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. American Board of Com'rs of Foreign Missions v. FerryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1883
  3. Buchar's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Talladega College v. CallananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API