Legal Opinion

People v. Rexford

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1998No. Docket 199158PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

Defendant appeals by leave granted from an October 23, 1996, opinion and order of the circuit court affirming the district court’s July 22, 1996, ruling that Breathalyzer results were admissible against him. We affirm the ruling of the circuit court.

On April 20, 1996, defendant was arrested for drunken driving after submitting to a Breathalyzer test. He was charged alternatively with the offenses of operating with an unlawful blood alcohol level or operating under the influence as a second offender. On June 11, 1996, defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a reduced charge of impaired driving,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. KrulikowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. SchwabMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. WillisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MullenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. CarpenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. People v. WujkowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Stassi v. Ransom Township Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2001
  5. People of Michigan v. Alton Fontenot JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API