Planas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court's order, which denied Planas' Motion to Correct an Unlawful Sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The motion, while purportedly seeking to correct an illegal sentence, was instead an attack on both the conviction and the sentence. A motion under rule 3.800(a) is not available where, as here, the defendant seeks to challenge the validity of the conviction (and, by extension, the "legality" of the sentence). Lopez v. State, 2 So.3d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ; Coughlin v. State, 932 So.2d 1224, 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (holding that "a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coughlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- DIEGO JIMENEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- ENIEL PLANAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- JOSE D. RAMIREZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- LARRY WILLIAMS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- ROQUE ESTEBAN CALAFELL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.