Legal Opinion

Wietecha v. Peoronard

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was originally argued with Mahoney v. Carus Chem. Co., 102 N.J. 564 (1986), also decided today. Its tragic circumstances illustrate the difficulties of applying the “fireman’s rule” to complex factual situations. We believe, however, *594that the lower courts correctly applied the rule to the police officers investigating accidents here, and thus, we affirm the order of summary judgment entered below.

This suit arises out of a multi-car accident that occurred on Route 495 in the Township of North Bergen during the late evening and early morning hours of August 27 and 28, 1981. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Mahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Allstate Insurance v. MalecSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Rosa v. Dunkin' Donuts of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Sepega v. DeLaura ConcurrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Minnich v. MED WASTE, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API