Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 18, 1996, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a retail sales clerk until she resigned after approximately seven days on the job. In her subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits, claimant stated that she had left her employment because of the insufficiency of her training and the lack of communication *650wi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of TrainorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SaglimbeniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of CioffiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API