Legal Opinion
Rowell v. Lindsay
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin
Decided July 1, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
DyeR, D. J.
This is á bill to restrain the infringement of a patent for an alleged now and useful improvement in cultivators. The original patent was issued to complainants July 3, 1866. A re-issue was granted March 31, 1868. Various defences are interposed, among which is the defence that the defendants are selling cultivators made by Thomas, Ludlow & Rodgers, of Springfield, Ohio, which are covered by letters patent No. 152,706, granted to J. H. & J. W. Thomas, June 30, 1874, and they deny that they aro infringing complainants’ patent. In the specifications of the patent, the invention is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gill v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Prouty and Mears v. RUGGLESSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Gould v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Vance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kennedy v. Solar Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1895
- Smith v. HamiltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1895