Legal Opinion
C & H Construction & Paving, Inc. v. Foundation Reserve Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1973No. 9578PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
Plaintiff Albuquerque Auto Sales, Inc. brought an action in the district court against defendants, Fermin Medina and C & H Construction & Paving, Inc., for damages allegedly suffered in an automobile collision. Defendant Medina answered, denying all but the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint. Defendant C & H Construction & Paving, Inc. answered, denying all of the allegations of the complaint and asserting the affirmative defense of contributory negligence. C & H Construction & Paving, Inc. thereafter filed an amended-third-party complaint against Foundation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Jones v. International Union of Operating EngineersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McNutt v. New Mexico State Tribune CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chatterjee v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Santistevan v. Centinel Bank of TaosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Delgado v. CostelloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Saenz v. MorrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.