Legal Opinion
Phillips v. G & H SEED CO.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 2011No. 10-1405PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOKS, Judge.
Plaintiffs, who consist of several dozen buyers and/or processors of crawfish, appeal the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment, which dismissed the remaining claims of the buyer/processor plaintiffs. For the following reasons, we reverse the summary judgment grants, and remand the matter back to the trial court for trial on the merits.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This protracted and contentious litigation had its genesis in the late 1990’s, when Bayer CropScience LP and its employee, Michael G. Redlich, marketed the insecticide ICON in Louisiana.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Roberts v. BenoitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Entrevia v. HoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wiltz v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LTD. PARTNERSHIPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Phillips v. G & H SEED CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Phillips v. G & H Seed Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bank of Louisiana v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Patrick E. Phillips v. G & H Seed Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.