Legal Opinion
McNeill v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided July 30, 1999No. A-7001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Two state troopers came to McNeill’s house to investigate an on-going domestic disturbance between McNeill and his wife. Just as the troopers were about to begin questioning McNeill, he ordered them to “get the hell out” of his house. The troopers refused to leave until McNeill explained what was going on. The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether, under these circumstances, the troopers were obliged to administer Miranda warnings to McNeill before they questioned him. As explained below, we conclude that McNeill was not in custody for Miranda purposes at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Winterrowd v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Harry Kradel. v. Piper IndustriesTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Shay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- State v. TownsendNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010