Legal Opinion

Commissioners of Highways v. Ellwood

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of DeKalb county; the Hon. Charles A. Bishop, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

But three questions are presented by this record: First, whether it is indispensable to the legality of a petition prepared under section 31 of chapter 121, entitled “Roads,” etc., (Hurd’s Stat. 1899, p. 1475,) praying that an existing road be altered, widened or vacated or a new road established, that the petition shall expressly state the facts necessary to show those signing the petition were qualified to so sign; second, whether it is a necessary qualification of a petitioner that he shall reside within two miles of the road to be altered, widened, vacated or laid out; third, whether, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hammock v. Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Perteet v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Inhabitants of CaribouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  2. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. People ex rel. Morrison v. SchwiesowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API